Documentary
Topic Suggestion: Stereotypes (About and within Punahou)
First point of view: Stereotypes are extremely relevant in life: racism, sexism, and other prejudices are all based in them. But stereotypes and groupings are especially frequent in high schools. People are defined as jocks, geeks, sluts, and so on, and it is very common to have a negative impression of a peer before speaking to—or even meeting—them. At Punahou, stereotypes are especially prevalent because of how people view Punahou students. The image of the stereotypical spoiled, rich, snobby Punahou student is wide-spread and has affected most, if not all, of us. Most stereotypes are negative, and as such, have a very negative effect on those they are focused on. Everyone has experienced what it feels like to be stereotyped—whether it is a joke about race, or your car being keyed because of the Punahou bumper sticker on the back. Stereotypes and generalities can be very harmful, and should be avoided.
Second point of view: In Hawaii, stereotypes don’t really exist. We don’t have problems with racism, hate crimes, or sexism, and this is a direct result of the fact that stereotypes—in Hawaii, at least—aren’t around anymore. Obviously, some people still hold prejudices, but for the most part, stereotyping has died out.
Third point of view: All stereotypes are based in fact, and are therefore generally accurate. If you pay attention to stereotypes, you’ll be safer than people who don’t. You’ll know—just by looking at someone—if they’re dangerous, weak, smart, rich, and so on. Knowing stereotypes can really help you decide who to talk to and how to talk to them.
There perspectives are all relevant to the documentary because they represent three very different kinds of thinking. Without each of them (and others not represented here), the documentary would be incomplete, and possibly biased. Different perspectives also bring up the question of how people with different ways of thinking (i.e., the person who believes stereotypes are good and the person who believes that stereotypes are bad) would interact with each other in regards to the topic of stereotypes. Would people with different views on stereotypes be able to get along? Would they be able to come to an agreement about stereotypes, and differences between people? There points and questions could also be explored in the documentary.
Topic Suggestion: Stereotypes (About and within Punahou)
First point of view: Stereotypes are extremely relevant in life: racism, sexism, and other prejudices are all based in them. But stereotypes and groupings are especially frequent in high schools. People are defined as jocks, geeks, sluts, and so on, and it is very common to have a negative impression of a peer before speaking to—or even meeting—them. At Punahou, stereotypes are especially prevalent because of how people view Punahou students. The image of the stereotypical spoiled, rich, snobby Punahou student is wide-spread and has affected most, if not all, of us. Most stereotypes are negative, and as such, have a very negative effect on those they are focused on. Everyone has experienced what it feels like to be stereotyped—whether it is a joke about race, or your car being keyed because of the Punahou bumper sticker on the back. Stereotypes and generalities can be very harmful, and should be avoided.
Second point of view: In Hawaii, stereotypes don’t really exist. We don’t have problems with racism, hate crimes, or sexism, and this is a direct result of the fact that stereotypes—in Hawaii, at least—aren’t around anymore. Obviously, some people still hold prejudices, but for the most part, stereotyping has died out.
Third point of view: All stereotypes are based in fact, and are therefore generally accurate. If you pay attention to stereotypes, you’ll be safer than people who don’t. You’ll know—just by looking at someone—if they’re dangerous, weak, smart, rich, and so on. Knowing stereotypes can really help you decide who to talk to and how to talk to them.
There perspectives are all relevant to the documentary because they represent three very different kinds of thinking. Without each of them (and others not represented here), the documentary would be incomplete, and possibly biased. Different perspectives also bring up the question of how people with different ways of thinking (i.e., the person who believes stereotypes are good and the person who believes that stereotypes are bad) would interact with each other in regards to the topic of stereotypes. Would people with different views on stereotypes be able to get along? Would they be able to come to an agreement about stereotypes, and differences between people? There points and questions could also be explored in the documentary.
